The fact that room exists for Darwin’s Theory in Intelligent Design does not stop the all or nothing tactics of those who oppose I.D. Claiming that the findings of the Genome Project are couched in mathematical or scientific terms is typical intellectual laziness. Intelligent Design is no hoax. A science based reality called Darwinism has been encapsulated by Intelligent Design. I.D. should be taught alongside evolution in public schools because it is Darwinism's origin. Organisms have a set of instructions that allow them to adapt through designed inheritance. The laws of physics are a set of external instructions that are not inherited but were written. People, the program continues to write itself before our eyes. It was designed to do that by GOD. With the argument raging it may take devine intervention for a higher theory that incorporates both to be developed.

Many who oppose Intelligent Design fear the conclusions of the Genome Project results that gave credence to a "designer" being responsible for all forms of life. The fact that "scientific" creationism or Intelligent Design can't be taught alongside evolution in public schools is the result of the anti religious bias of a certain political group that ignore facts and uses the courts to enforce it’s agenda. In Islamic nations religion and government are indistinguishable and they don’t teach Intelligent Design either. The advancements in computer technology that made the large-scale sequencing of human DNA possible would never have occurred in an Islamic nation. It is ironic that technological advancements ended up affirming what Islamic nations already know. So why do opponents denounce the influence of Christianity as being too fanatical while siding with fanatical groups like Hamas and Hezzbolah? Do they fear some new Christian non-denominational religion that argues GOD stands for Grand Old Designer? Is it the Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster? I am convinced that genomics is emerging as a powerful research tool with the potential to transform medical care in ways yet dreamed of. I pray that it isn’t transformed by those with a political agenda that have no respect for its origin.

Why has the truth about racism not been quantified in terms of the leverage it affords Democrats? Never before will this be as evident as it will in the coming election. America will be held hostage to the insistence that not voting for Obama means you are a racist. Obama’s handlers can spin his writings about feelings of distrust toward most whites any way they want. They come across as hypocritical as the Congressional Black Caucus. The supposed caucus clapped for "Cold Cash Jefferson" rather than admonish him for his taking bribes. Their idea of closing disparities between blacks and whites is to keep them apart. Just ask Republican Stephen Cohen. He was rejected by the Congressional Black Caucus even though many black people voted for him. At this point in American history, the idea that racial identity is more important to blacks than whites is as true as the fact that it is promoted by the Democratic Party for purposes of exploitation and for no other reason.

Instead of helping minorities to assimilate as Americans, Democrats have sold the victim mentality. Good intentions can't remove the fact that they have insisted on lowering bars and watering down achievement rather than ask that voters submit to the same standards that Americans, not white Americans, have accepted.

Why do you think that black students from other countries do better in school? Could it be that they are not influenced by minority leaders that line their pockets while preaching separatist multiculturalism. Back in 1965 liberals and angry black politicians built a new plantation run by big government. The welfare plantation removed personal responsibility and replaced family structure with victimization and dependency. Who benefited then and who benefits now from the separation of races? It’s the same people and Barack Obama is their anointed one.

How long until teaching the kind of tolerance that honors every identity that isn't American or white gives rise to the idea of seeing nothing wrong with a Congressional White Caucus? The hypocrisy of organizations like the Congressional Black Caucus argue for exactly this kind of thinking.

Liberals argued hard for changing standards of admission to colleges based on race or ethnicity. Since tuition cost is one of the largest obstacles for minority college students, why didn’t liberals argue for charging whites a different tuition price based on the same criteria? Oh no, that would be racist!